An argument that the us is justified in spending billions of dollars on nasa space missions to mars

Things will be tight in the early years, but as the program progresses things will loosen up.

An argument that the us is justified in spending billions of dollars on nasa space missions to mars

Gray Why Give a Damn: Why should we spend money on space exploration when we have so many problems here on planet Earth? Read what this astronaut has to say about it. And most unreasonably, through his social enterprise incubator the Manna Energy Foundation he has helped to bring drinking water to millions in Africa in a completely financially self sustaining way via his company, Manna Energy Ltd.

Two-Way Technology Transfer During the past 50 years we frequently heard about the many amazing spinoffs from the human spaceflight program — everything from personal computers to solar energy. Now, we are also seeing direct tangible benefits from the research being conducted on the International Space Station ISS.

Curious about better medicines, providing clean water, and growing enough food for the increasing global population? Research on this orbiting laboratory is not only enabling humans to explore the solar system, it is leading to countless improvements for life on Earth.

For example, space based science offers an environment to foster new materials, better medicines, improved methods to provide clean water, and better ways to grow enough food to feed our increasing global population.

Studying astronauts living and working in space also enhances our understanding of the human body, resulting in innovative ways to protect all humans from many different ailments.

The list of benefits is endless. I like to point out that the space program technology transfer is two-way. Many NASA engineers give their expertise and spare time to apply space program technology to problems facing the developing world.

In doing so, they learn valuable lessons that will allow us to push space exploration beyond low-earth orbit. The highly efficient engineering approaches that are required in the developing world — robust solutions that do not require a lot of maintenance, resupply or training — are the same approaches we need to employ if we are going to break out of the bounds of low-earth orbit.

Engineering for the developing world and engineering to break the bounds of low-earth orbit have much in common. A solar powered refrigerator designed to support life on the Moon, but with huge application on Earth, earned the prestigious title for They also realized the need for a comparable solar refrigerator that could operate in conjunction with the simple solar lighting systems already in place on Earth.

This system eliminates reliance on an electric grid, requires no batteries, stores thermal energy for efficient use when sunlight is absent, and works anywhere in the world.

Electricity is essential for storage of vaccines and medicine. This technology can greatly reduce the cost and increase the availability of vaccines delivered to the most impoverished regions of the world. NASA battery-free solar technology will improve life on Earth.

For information about this and other technology licensing opportunities, contact:No, space exploration should be first and foremost.A planed trip to mars in this time should not be even be technology catch up with our need to at us now,we are on the brink of cold have large coliders finding eliments never before idea of folding space is within our grasp.A mission to a distant.

Funding NASA could get us to put colonies on mars and the moon and over all help man kind by solving overpopulation and possibly even discovering other life forms.

Space exploration gives us no direct benefit

It would also help us develop technology by us mastering ways to get to space and ways to thrive in it. NASA: Sorry Jimmy, we need these billions of dollars for space exploration Jimmy: Will it help feed me?

An argument that the us is justified in spending billions of dollars on nasa space missions to mars

NASA: No, but if another Jimmy, say, in 50 years, need to know if there was water in Mars, he will know, thanks to us. I believe the US spends approximately % of federal government spending on NASA and NASA spends only a fraction of that on space missions.

That's a reasonable pittance to devote to resolving uncertainty and protecting us from threats out there we might not have a good handle on and are only starting to sort out how to deal with. If this was going to be a valid argument, economists would have to have a magic wand that would allow them to predict the long-term economic result of taxing and spending to support crewed space programs, taxing and spending to do other things, or refraining from taxing and spending.

- “The United States is justified in spending billions of dollars on NASA space missions to Mars.” Throughout the course of history, man has dreamed of stepping foot on another planet. The advances in technology in the 20th century have allowed man to do what at one time was considered unthinkable for millenniums before.

Is space exploration worth the money? |